I expect this to be my last post initiating a Rule topic [it was a work-in-progress].
A while back op$k!ll@ [sp?] complained to Eas about a bunch of defences. They went around the map with Eas deleting props here and there. I distracted them from visiting Miracle's garage
Eas was getting hot about the props and was saying 'which admin(s) do I have to ban'.
It seems that Eas does not want prop arrangements that put the attacker at a great disadvantage: eg particularly ones where attacker has to strafe.
We all 'know' that fence mazes are banned [maze = mess-of-fences, not necessarily a traditional maze.]
To help the Trial admins and to generate discussion by all, I made some sample prop installations in an apartment at the bottom of the Luxury building -the one near the Ball and Horses. (see door #494.)
I would like to see a concept and philosophy spelled out by Eas of course. In the mean time you have the samples to view.
A while back op$k!ll@ [sp?] complained to Eas about a bunch of defences. They went around the map with Eas deleting props here and there. I distracted them from visiting Miracle's garage
Eas was getting hot about the props and was saying 'which admin(s) do I have to ban'.
It seems that Eas does not want prop arrangements that put the attacker at a great disadvantage: eg particularly ones where attacker has to strafe.
We all 'know' that fence mazes are banned [maze = mess-of-fences, not necessarily a traditional maze.]
To help the Trial admins and to generate discussion by all, I made some sample prop installations in an apartment at the bottom of the Luxury building -the one near the Ball and Horses. (see door #494.)
I would like to see a concept and philosophy spelled out by Eas of course. In the mean time you have the samples to view.