Ok, now you at least agree that's an issue. The reason why I posted here is because forum mods or some other people who contact the coder can tell him about the issue when it's discussed on forum. You see, in this case at first you did not even accept it's a bug. So what was the point to write directly to coder with unrelated shit? Anyways, I hope it will be fixed in future, because [read above].
I agree that we shouldnt have unnessecary files in fastdl,
we may still conflict on resolution, but your proposed issue was having an unused file in your directories, and I 1000% understand that.
It will be brought up when it is time to deal with it, but the point is that we're not sitting on our asses just because we dont want to do something. This issue has been brought up in the past, but we still have a clusterfuck of bugs to deal with.
That's what I wanted to hear.
And yeah, tell your stories about "it takes time to fix" and this kind to someone who doesn't know how much time it actually takes and what amount of work should be performed in this particular case, which is 2 clicks if someone is wondering
Like I said, I dont even have access so my ambition is out of question there.
I've been trying to get access, but am still waiting..
A lot of the 2 click fixes get pushed to the side for the real challenges because fact is..
most of our developers are bored of all the baseline stuff.
They'd much rather work on making the next big thing than fine tuning what is already there.
If/when I get the access.. a lot more attention will get spent in the finer details.
The post was edited 1 time, last by [RLS] Klizmotron ().