See pic.
FueledByBread^3 Killing Under 10s
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
Could you possibly get a demo?#HailTheGoldenPoon
-
Nah. Sorry. I don't record demos by default. Check logs, but I know he didn't revenge kill. Those 2 guys don't even know how to equip guns.
-
What exactly would checking the logs do...
-
Firdt of all... a plain. picture of noob defender going off in chat is hardly evidence for unprovoked non revenge killing
Second, it doesnt help that you get banned for stupid shit yourself sometimes -
duer wrote:
Firdt of all... a plain. picture of noob defender going off in chat is hardly evidence for unprovoked non revenge killing
Second, it doesnt help that you get banned for stupid shit yourself sometimes
eldrun wrote:
What exactly would checking the logs do...
The post was edited 1 time, last by ZomBloR! ().
-
Without a demo, it's nearly impossible to gain context.
All logs show is kills. Thery don'tt show chat, interactions around the time of offence ect..
This ban request will be discredited with only 1 screenshot and no demo -
and no format
Post Count = n + 973. Because Mike can't fix shit.
i love sidezz because he fixed my postcount -
eldrun wrote:
What exactly would checking the logs do...
While there is certainly not enough evidence here. It takes about a minute to verify in the logs that at least something is happening, if they have been warned for it, if multiple players have been complaining etc. Which lets admin knows to look out for it more with a certain user.
It is extremely rare for people not to speak up about it in chat that is logged. Heck half the investigations I used to do before bans would end up with the killer saying "so, no admin is online" or similar.
IMO if someone is bored looking for something to do and has log access, they really should take a look at it. It generally always provides useful information even if it isn't enough for a ban and every once in awhile, there really is 100% substantial proof in the logs and if you talk to the rule breaker, show them the logs, they generally either say "sorry it won't happen again" since they know even with admins offline they can get caught. Or they deny it and you watch them closely until in game visuals are seen which really isn't hard at that point.The post was edited 3 times, last by BobVeka ().
-
BobVeka wrote:
eldrun wrote:
What exactly would checking the logs do...
While there is certainly not enough evidence here. It takes about a minute to verify in the logs that at least something is happening, if they have been warned for it, if multiple players have been complaining etc. Which lets admin knows to look out for it more with a certain user.
It is extremely rare for people not to speak up about it in chat that is logged. Heck half the investigations I used to do before bans would end up with the killer saying "so, no admin is online" or similar.
IMO if someone is bored looking for something to do and has log access, they really should take a look at it. It generally always provides useful information even if it isn't enough for a ban and every once in awhile, there really is 100% substantial proof in the logs and if you talk to the rule breaker, show them the logs, they generally either say "sorry it won't happen again" since they know even with admins offline they can get caught. Or they deny it and you watch them closely until in game visuals are seen which really isn't hard at that point.
I was going off the assumption that someone would just be using Sql logs to verify